Explore: Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Telematika (Telekomunikasi, Multimedia dan Informatika) is committed to maintaining the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes the importance of correcting published articles when errors are identified and retracting articles when their findings or publication integrity are seriously compromised.
All requests for corrections or retractions are assessed fairly and objectively by the Editorial Board, taking into account the available evidence, the nature of the issue, and its implications for the scholarly record.
1. Corrections
A correction may be issued when an error is identified in a published article and the error can be addressed without invalidating the overall findings or conclusions of the work.
Corrections may concern, but are not limited to:
-
Errors in author names, affiliations, or other publication metadata.
-
Typographical, formatting, or factual errors that affect the clarity or accuracy of the article.
-
Errors in tables, figures, references, or other published content.
-
Omissions or inaccuracies that require clarification to ensure the article is properly understood.
Requests for corrections may be submitted by authors, readers, or other parties with relevant supporting information. The editor will assess the request and determine whether a formal correction is necessary.
When a correction is approved, the journal will publish an appropriate correction notice and establish a clear link between the notice and the original article. The original article will remain available, with the correction documented transparently where applicable.
2. Retractions
Retraction may be considered when serious problems undermine the reliability, originality, or ethical integrity of a published article.
Grounds for retraction may include:
-
Confirmed plagiarism or substantial unattributed duplication.
-
Fabrication or falsification of research data or results.
-
Serious methodological or analytical errors that invalidate the principal findings or conclusions.
-
Duplicate publication or redundant publication that violates publication ethics.
-
Serious authorship or publication ethics violations that affect the validity or integrity of the publication.
-
Unethical research practices or other significant misconduct that compromises the article's credibility.
-
Other circumstances in which retraction is necessary to correct the scholarly record.
A retraction is not intended to punish authors for honest errors that can be adequately corrected. The decision must be based on the seriousness of the problem and its effect on the reliability or integrity of the published work.
3. Retraction Procedure
When a potential need for retraction is identified, the journal will conduct an appropriate assessment of the available evidence.
The procedure may include:
-
Receiving and evaluating information concerning the published article.
-
Reviewing the relevant manuscript, publication records, data, and supporting documentation.
-
Requesting an explanation or response from the authors concerned.
-
Consulting independent experts or relevant institutions when necessary.
-
Evaluating the findings and determining the appropriate editorial action.
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision regarding correction or retraction, taking into account the evidence, relevant ethical considerations, and recommendations from the Editorial Board or independent experts where applicable.
The journal aims to provide the authors concerned with a fair opportunity to respond. However, appropriate action may be taken when necessary to protect the integrity of the scholarly record, even if the authors do not respond.
4. Publication of Retraction Notices
When an article is retracted, the journal will publish a clear retraction notice explaining the reason for the retraction to the extent that the available evidence permits.
The notice will identify the affected article and provide a transparent explanation of the editorial action. The retraction notice will be linked to the original article, and the original article will be clearly marked as retracted while remaining accessible for the purpose of maintaining the scholarly record.
The journal will ensure that the retraction status is communicated clearly to readers and that the relevant publication metadata are updated where applicable.
5. Requests for Corrections or Retractions
Authors, readers, reviewers, institutions, and other interested parties may submit requests or report concerns regarding published articles through the journal's official contact channels.
Requests should identify the article concerned, describe the issue, and provide relevant evidence or supporting documentation. All submissions will be assessed objectively and handled in accordance with the journal's editorial and publication ethics policies.
The submission of a request does not automatically result in a correction or retraction. The final decision depends on the results of the editorial assessment.
6. Relationship with Research Misconduct Investigations
When a correction or retraction request involves suspected research misconduct, the journal will also apply its policy on allegations of research misconduct.
The journal may seek clarification from the authors, consult relevant institutions, or request an independent assessment when appropriate. The journal reserves the right to take editorial action based on the available evidence and its responsibility to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.
7. Transparency and Editorial Responsibility
Explore is committed to handling corrections and retractions consistently, transparently, and responsibly. Editorial actions will be proportionate to the nature and seriousness of the identified issue.
The journal's primary objective is to ensure that readers are accurately informed about the reliability and status of published research while upholding fairness, academic integrity, and responsible scholarly communication.
