PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI BAGIAN PROTOKOL DAN KOMUNIKASI PIMPINAN SEKRETARIAT DAERAH KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG
Abstract
Improving the quality of human resources will have an impact on progress for the government to survive changes and competition in the sometimes unstable sphere of government. Another problem is the spotlight on the performance of bureaucracy in organizing public services, where during this pandemic the government is considered to have low performance in providing services to the community. This is also felt by the Protocol and Communication Section of the City Leader of Bandar Lampung. Based on observations made in the Protocol and Communication Section of the Head of the Bandar Lampung City Secretariat by looking at employee performance as a benchmark in research shows that the performance of employees has not been achieved optimally due to the number of employees who contracted the virus and decreased work motivation.
This research aims to identify and analyze how much Communication, and Motivation affect Employee Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic in the Protocol and Communication Section of the Bandar Lampung City Regional Secretariat. The research method used in this research is quantitative data analysis. Can be concluded, as follows: Problem sources, problem formulations, relevant concepts and theories and relevant discoveries, Hypothesis submissions, research methods, compiling research instruments, and conclusions.
Based on the results of the above research, it can be taken a conclusion as follows: Communication has a significant effect on employee performance from the results of partial hypothesis tests in can the value of t calculate communication variables included in a high classification that means significant effect. Work Motivation has a significant effect on employee performance from the results of hypothetical tests partially in can the value of t calculate the variable Motivation included in the moderate classification (sufficient) which means a significant effect. Communication and Motivation work together have a significant effect on employee performance from the results of hypothesis tests simultaneously expressed accepted by other words accepting the hypothesis (Ha) and rejecting the hypothesis (Ho) has a mutual effect on employee performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A.Halim, 2001, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta, Ghalla Indonesia
A. Maslow, 2002, Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya (Cetakan Ketiga). Jakarta. PT Rineka Cipta.
Anwar, 2004, Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta, PT. Ganudra Pustaka Utama
Arep Tanjung, 2004, Komunikasi Antar Pribadi, Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti
Dessler, 2002, Perubahan dan Pengembangan Organisasi. Bandung. Sinar Baru
Devito, 2003, Manajemen Personalia, Edisi Kedua, Yogyakarta, BPFE UGM
Edison, Emron. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Goldhaber, 2003. Komunikasi dan Interaksi, Bandung. PT Balai Bahasa
Gomes, 2000. Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Pegawai. Jakarta. PT. Ganudra Pustaka Utama
Guilford, J.P. 1956, Fundamental Statistic In Psychology And Education.3rd Ed New York: Macgraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Harold D. Laswel, 2001 Komunikasi dan Interaksi, Bandung , PT Balai Bahasa
Hasibuan, Malayu SP, 2003,. Manajemen sumber daya manusia: dasar kunci keberhasilan. Jakarta: CV Haji Mas Agung.
Hasibuan, Malayu, 2002, Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian dan Masalah. Jakarta: Gunung Agung
Herzberg, 2001, Teori Motivasi ke dua. Jakarta.Pustaka Indah
Ilyas, 2006, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Evaluasi Penilaian Kinerja) Jakarta, Rajawali.
Khomsahrial Romli, 2015, Komunikasi Organisasi Lengkap, Jakarta.Grasindo
Luwihono, Slamet, 2013. Mengubah Perilaku Melalui Sebuah Peraturan. Jakarta Majalah Tetruka, Edisi Januari
Maryoto, 2000, Kebijakan Kinerja Pegawai, Yogyakarta. BPF
Matituna, 2010, Organisasi Perkantoran dan Motivasi. Bandung. Alumni
Nawawi, Ismail. (2013). Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan, Dan Kinerja. Jakarta : Prenadamedia Group.
Megah Sendjaja, 2004, Komunikasi Manajemen, Jakarta, Pioner.
Pace, 2002, Komunikasi Organisasi. Balai Bahasa Montana , Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Panuju, 2001, Komunikasi Manajemen, Jakarta, Pioner
Rangkuti, 2001, Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis, Jakarta, PT. Gramedia Pustaka
Redding, 2003,Teori Komunikasi 1 dan 2, Yogyakarta,Kanisius
Saefullah, 2005, Etika Komunikasi Kantor, Bandung, Citra Inti
Sopiah. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.
Sugiono, 2013, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung, Alfabeta
Sumartono,2003, Perilaku Organisasi Edisi12, Jakarta, Salemba Empat
Sunarjo, 2005, Tips Membangun sistem komunikasi yang efektif. Jakarta PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Sutrisno Hadi, 2006, Metode Penelitian Survey, Surabaya, Usaha Nasional
Terry, GR. 2001. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta, PT. Rineka Cipta
Wahjosumidjo, 2010, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia .Jakarta. PT Indeks
Zainun, 2001, Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung, PT. Refika Aditama.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/ejkpp.v8i1.2478
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.