Kebijakan Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Tahun 2015
Abstract
Pre-trial has been set in the Criminal Procedure Code reap a lot of criticism from legal practitioners. In practice, it turns out pre-trial failed to give justice to those seeking justice in particular suspects in criminal proceedings. Government and Parliament have made a Draft Law on the Code of Criminal Procedure (Draft Criminal Code) which one to replace it with a Justice Pre Preliminary Examining Judge. The main problem in implementing this research include: What is the reason for that is the basis for the reconstruction policy settings Preliminary Examining Judge in Criminal Procedure Bill 2015. Results of this study are: the reason on which to base the reconstruction policy settings Preliminary Examining Judge is to better protect human rights guarantees in particular for seeking justice in the criminal justice process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anthon F. Susanto, Teori-Teori Hukum, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2010
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,2014
Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2002Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, Komentar KUHAP, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2003
Oemar Seno Adji, Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Prospeksi, Erlangga, Jakarta, 1984
Lobby Loqman, Pra Peradilan Di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2006
Darji Damordiharjo dan Shidarta, Pokok- Pokok Filsafat Hukum : Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum di Indonesia, Ed. V. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 1995
William N. Dunn, Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik (Edisi Kedua), Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2003SR.
Sianturi, Asas-asas Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Alumni Ahaem-Patahaem, Jakarta, 1996
Nurahman, Dwi, Kebijakan Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Tahun 2015, Universitas Bandar Lampung, 2015.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.