Tinjauan Kembali Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (Selznick, 1957)

Ayi Ahadiat

Abstract


Conceptually, leadership, as an on going debatable topic, is becoming a more elusive and ambiguous research constructs. Therefore, it will always be a “hot topic” to be studied and discoursed. Core concept of leaderhip is very important to be used in critical decision making. Selznick (1957) has been a clasic in leaderhip elaborates concept of leaderhip beyond efficency, beyond organization, leadership responsibility and creativity. The distinctive competence concept has inspired various studis in resource-based view strategic management. In the review section the writer emphasize pros and cons of leaderhip that show more contribution to the development of leadership theory.



Keywords


leadership; pros and cons leadership.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansoff, H. I. 1979. Strategic Management. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Bennis, W. 1997. Becoming a Leader of Leaders. In Gibson, R. Rethinking the Future: Business, Principle, Competition, Control, Leadership, Market and the World: 149-163. London, UK: NB Publishing

Fulmer, R.M. & Goldsmith, M. 2001. The Leadership Investment: How the World's Best Organization gain Strategic Advantage through Leadership Development,New York: AMACOM

Grant, R. M. 2002, Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concept, Techniques, Application (4th ed.). Massachussetts: Blackwell

Jenkins, W. O. 1947. A Review of Leadership Studies with Particular Reference to Military Problems. In Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Row, Petersson and Company.

Karmel, B. 1977. Leadership: A Challenge to Traditional Research Methods and Assumption. Academy of Management Review, 3: 475-482

Mendl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. 1985. The Romance of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30:78-102

Miner, J.B. 1982. Theories of Organization Behaviour, IL: The Dryden Press

Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lesson from America's Best-Run Companies. New York: Warner Books

Pfferer, J. 1977. The Ambiguity of Leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2: 104-112

Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Row, Petersson and Company.

Smircich, L. & Morgan, G. 1982. Leadership: The Management of Meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18:257-273

Stogdill, R. M. 1948. Personal Factor Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. In Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Row, Petersson and Company.

Thomas, B. A. 1988. Does Leadership Make a Difference to Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33:388-400

Tichy, N. M. 1983. Managing Strategic Change: Technical, Political and Cultural Dynamics. New York: Wiley

Vance, S. C. 1983. Corporate Leadership: Boards, Directors and Startegy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company

Yukl, G. 1989. Leadership in Organization, (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Yukl, G. 1989. Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management, 15: 251-289




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/jmv.v3i2.693

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Visionist saat ini terindeks:

Penerbit Journal: Program Studi Manajemen (S2) Program Pascasarjana Universitas Bandar Lampung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Technical Support by:  RYE Education Hub