Analisa Pengaruh Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Melalui Kejelasan Peran dan Pemberdayaan Pisikologis sebagai Variabel Moderating

Dwi Sartika

Abstract


This study examines the influence of Performance Measurement System to Role Clarity, Psychological Empowerment and Managerial Performance. Continuing research by Hall (2004), as for becoming object from this research is manufacturing business which located in Lampung of Indonesia.

 This research represents the empirical test which used random sampling technics in data collection. Data were collected using a survey of 148 maid chairman private colleges in Lampung, Indonesia. Data analysis uses Structural Equation Model (SEM) with the program SmartPLS (Partial Least Square).

 

Result of hypothesis Examination indicate that from five hypothesis raised, only two accepted hypothesis. Accepted Hypothesis is hypothesis 2 (there are positive influence between Performance Measurement System to Role Clarity) and hypothesis 5 (there are positive influence between Psychological Empowerment to Managerial Performance). While hypothesis 1 (there are no influence between Performance Measurement System to Managerial Performance), hypothesis 3 (there are no influence between Role Clarity to Managerial Performance), hypothesis 4 (there are no influence between Performance Measurement System to Psychological Empowerment) are rejected hypothesis.

Keywords


Performance Measurement System; Role Clarity; Psychological Empowerment; Managerial Performance; Structural Equation Model (SEM); Partial Least Square (PLS).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Collins, F. (1982). "Managerial accounting systems and organizational control: a role perspective." Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(2): pp. 107-12.

Ghozali, I (2006). “Structural Equation Modeling, Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square”. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Hall, M. (2004). “The effect of Comprehensive Performance Measurement Systems on Role Clarity, Psycological, Empowerment and Managerial Performance”.

Jackson, S.E. and Schuler, R.S. (1985). "A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings."Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 36: pp. 16-78.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996). Translating strategy into action: the balanced scorecard. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

Kim, L and Larry, N (1998).”Performance effect of complementarities between manufacturing practice and management accounting system”. Journal of management accounting research. Volume 10: pp. 325–346

Mia, L dan Brian Clarke, 1999, Market Competition, Management Accounting Systems and Business Unit Performance, Management Accounting Research. Vol.10. 137-158

Mulyadi. and Johny. 1999,”Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen: Sistem Pelipat Ganda Kinerja Perusahaan”. Edisi I, Aditya Media, Yogyakarta. Hal. 214

Otley, D (1995). ”Management control, organization design and accounting information system”.UK: Prentice Hall

Randolph, W.A. (1995). "Navigating the journey to empowerment." Organzational Dynamics 23(4): pp. 19-32.

Sawyer, J.E. (1992). "Goal and process clarity: specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences." Journal of Applied Psychology 77: pp. 130-142

Simons, R. (2000). “Performance measurement & control systems for implementing strategy: text & cases”. Upper Sadle River, Prentice Hall

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). "Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation." Academy of Management Journal 38(5): pp. 1442-1465.

Thomas, K.W. and Velthouse, B.A. (1990). "Cognitive elements of empowerment: an "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation." Academy of Management Review 15(4): pp. 666-681.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/jak.v8i2.942