Keterbatasan Pengadilan untuk Melakukan Pengujian Konstitusional (Constitutional Review): Pengalaman Jepang

. Isharyanto


The realm of political practice today , a mechanism for checking the legal
norms by the court to ensure the coherence of the legislation of the constitution becomes inevitable (judicial constitutional review ) . Learning the Japanese experience , that constitutionalism is the reconstruction of post-war Japan ystem ystem kenegaran of civil law -based rule by law be a constitutionalism which is based on the rule of law . Keywords : court , the Constitutional Review , Japan


Pengujian Konstitusional; Constitutional Review.

Full Text:



Bagir Manan, Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Konstitusi Suatu Negara, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1995.

David Marrani, “Confronting the symbolic position of the judge in western European Legal Traditions: A comparative Essay”, European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 3, 2010.

David S. Law, “The Anatomy of a Conservative Court: Judicial Review in Japan”, Journal Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, 2009.

Henderson, “Law and Political Modernization in Japan”, dalam Ward (Editor), Political Development in Japan, Princeton 1968.

Woodhouse, “The Law and Politics: More Power to the Judge – and to the People?”, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 54, 2001.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, Aspen Law & Bussiness, New York, 1997.

I Gede Dewa Palguna, Constitutional Complaint (Pengaduan Konstitusional) Upaya Hukum terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2013.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional, Jakarta, Konstitusi Press, 2005.

Kota Fukui, “Justice System Reform in Japan: The Connection Beetween Conflict Management and Realization General Rules of Law”, Osaka University Law Review, Vol. 51, 2004.

Leon Duguit dalam Alec Stone Sweet, “Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review and Why It May Not Matter ,” Disampaikan dalam Faculty Scholarship Series, Yale Law School, 1 Januari 2013.

Masanobu Kato, “The Role of Law and Lawyers in Japan and the United Sates”, Birham Young University Law Review, 1987.

Robert Mc Closkey, The American Supreme Court, Revised by Sanford Levinson, Fourth Edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 2005.

Timothy S. George, “Changing Pattern of Civic Engangement in Constitutionalism in Japan”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Asian Studies, Boston, 25 Maret 2007.

William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is, William Marrow, New York, 1989.

Isharyanto, "Keterbatasan Pengadilan untuk Melakukan Pengujian Konstitusional (Constitutional Review): Pengalaman Jepang", Universitas Bandar Lampung, 2015.


  • There are currently no refbacks.