ANALISIS YURIDIS DISKRESI KEPOLISIAN DALAM PENERAPAN DIVERSI

I KETUT SEREGIG

Abstract


The problem of diversion is often used as a legal reason for the parties involved as a suspect in a crime committed by a minor, both for the purpose of defense and in an attempt to avoid a suspect from imprisonment stipulated in the provisions of the law. Diversi as stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of Law Number 11 Year 2012, on the Criminal Justice System of the Child, is the transfer of the settlement of child cases from the criminal justice process to proceedings outside the criminal justice.In the case of the transfer of cases of perpetrators of minor offenses, there have been various perceptions or differences of legal views, especially the understanding of "repetition of criminal acts". In criminal law theory the term repetition of a criminal offense is the same offense committed by a person more than once. In social life in society the perpetrator is called a residivist. In the process of investigating the application of the versions of underage residivists is a legal policy undertaken by the investigator in assessing whether the perpetrator deserves a diversion or not.The result of the research can be concluded that the implementation of the diversion for underage perpetrators who perform repetition of acts in legal theory and legislation can be done as a form of police discretion conducted by investigators. The discretion made by the investigator is done on the coordination of Police investigators with other agencies, especially the Court, BAPAS, the victim's parents and the Legal Counsel accompanying the victim and other related parties.

The problem of diversion is often used as a legal reason for the parties involved as a suspect in a crime committed by a minor, both for the purpose of defense and in an attempt to avoid a suspect from imprisonment stipulated in the provisions of the law. Diversi as stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of Law Number 11 Year 2012, on the Criminal Justice System of the Child, is the transfer of the settlement of child cases from the criminal justice process to proceedings outside the criminal justice.In the case of the transfer of cases of perpetrators of minor offenses, there have been various perceptions or differences of legal views, especially the understanding of "repetition of criminal acts". In criminal law theory the term repetition of a criminal offense is the same offense committed by a person more than once. In social life in society the perpetrator is called a residivist. In the process of investigating the application of the versions of underage residivists is a legal policy undertaken by the investigator in assessing whether the perpetrator deserves a diversion or not.The result of the research can be concluded that the implementation of the diversion for underage perpetrators who perform repetition of acts in legal theory and legislation can be done as a form of police discretion conducted by investigators. The discretion made by the investigator is done on the coordination of Police investigators with other agencies, especially the Court, BAPAS, the victim's parents and the Legal Counsel accompanying the victim and other related parties.


Keywords


diversion; investigation process; minors; discretion.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. BUKU

Ahmad Ali, Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia (Penyebab dan Solusinya), Penerbit Ghalia, Jakarta, 2001.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.

Bambang Waluyo, Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktek, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2002.

Bambang Waluyo, Pidana dan Pemidanaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2004.

Kadri Husin, Diskresi dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 1999.

Lawrence M.Friedman, The Legal System: A Sosial Science Perspective, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1975.

Moeljatno, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana,PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2005.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 2005.

P.A.F.Lamintang, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Penerbit PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997.

Romli Atmasasmita, Problem Kenakalan Anak-anak Remaja, Armico, Bandung, 1993.

Romli Atmasasmita, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan II, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2000.

S.R. Sianturi, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Penerapannya, Cetakan IV, Alumni Ahaem-Peteheam, Jakarta, 1996.

B. PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Pemberlakuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.