Contingent Valuation Choice Modelling dan dalam Menilai Preferensi Penggunaan Energi Bangunan
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Accent. 2010. Review of Stated Preference and Willingness to Pay Methods. London. File name: 2003rep06.doc
Hanley, Nick; Susana Mourato; Robert E Wright. 2001. Choice Modeling Approaches : A Superior Alternative For Environmental Valuation Journal of Economic Surveys vol.15 no.3
Jin-Long Liu; Pe-I Changa; Su-Juan Dena. 2013. Consumer Willingness To Pay For Energy Conservation: A Comparison Between Revealed And Stated Preference Method. Procedia Environmental Sciences 17 (2013) 620 – 629
Kroes, Eric P; Sheldon, Robert J.1988 .Stated Preference Method : An Introduction
Mogas,Joan; Pere Riera; Jeff Bennett. (Tanpa Tahun). A Comparison Of Contingent Valuat ion And Choice Modelling: Estimating The Environmental Values Of Catalonian Forests
Robert, Mavsar. (Tanpa Tahun). Stated Preference Methods or Direct Valuation Methods. European Forest Institute Mediterranean regional office (EFIMED):www.efimed.efi.int
Scarpa,Riccardo ; Willis,Ken. 2010.Willingness- To-Pay For Renewable Energy: Primary And Discretionary Choice Of British Households' For Micro-Generation Technologies. Energy Economics 32 (2010) 129–136
Söderberg,Magnus. 2008. A Choice Modelling Analysis On The Similarity Between Distribution Utilities' And Industrial Customers' Price And Quality Preferences. Energy Economics 30 (2008) 1246–1262
Stoecklein,Albreicht; Skumatz, Lisa. 2007. 'Zero And Low Energy Homes In New Zealand: The Value Of Non-Energy Benefits And Their Use In Attracting Homeowners'. Panel 9, Dynamics Of Consumption ECEEE 2007 Summer Study, Saving Energy – Just Do It!
The Housing Corporation. 2000.Sustainable Homes: Embodied energy in Residential Property Development.
Wedgwood, Alison; Sansom, Kevin. 2003.Willingness To Pays Surveys : A Streamlined Approach. Water Engineering And Development Center Loughborough University, UK.
YoonKwak,So ;Seung-HoonYoo; Seung-Jun Kwak. 2010. Valuing Energy-Saving Measures In Residential Buildings: A Choice Experiment Study.Energy Policy 38 (2010) 673–677
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/jaubl.v4i1.457
JURNAL ARSITEKTUR saat ini terindeks:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cae6/3cae60503ffe2879b364888c4118672ada681a47" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c07e7/c07e75726c3d5931a60d21837182c9095e467b4a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a7e9/2a7e9f0d411369a7c20de74ed0cffa2e44e69da9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b935e/b935e3c24522c30b1c74d33aee22a383350fd794" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beea2/beea2cf5f2ee501249167134e712433e8de2b90d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0296c/0296c5e819e57435ddbb2c77742dfa548992c1fc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a4a4/5a4a46c9334aaebd09d7c827b5de4974b392103c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9244a/9244a4ca0b6b4047f5e65b4e1d6e010e4cb4bba7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aabf/8aabf14a03c99f534afa3e8b7ad365fa958b1e69" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f28d9/f28d997cb474bf839a817094b8efda6009171ee6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4671d/4671d7c9efd380cbb3094de6c14b44535994ceb3" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License