ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN BERSAMA TAHUN 2010 TENTANG SINKRONISASI KETATALAKSANAAN SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN BERKAITAN DENGAN KOORDINASI ANTARA PENYIDIK DENGAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM PADA PROSES PRAPEN
The Archipelago Insight's view states that development in the field of law
throughout the archipelago is based on a single legal entity that applies one national
law, namely by making and perfecting laws, enhanced by unification and codification,
which in the field of Criminal Procedure Code aims to enable the public to live up to
their rights and obligations and in order to improve the attitude and mental
development of law enforcers in accordance with their respective functions and
authorities towards the establishment and stability of law and justice as well as
protection of human dignity and order and legal interests. Fundamental changes in the
investigation stage have placed investigators and public prosecutors in a coordinating
relationship (functional and institutional) in the context of completing the criminal case
investigation process as a series of units. One of the goals of this coordinating
relationship is to avoid human rights violations in the investigation process. Technically
administratively, a prosecutor can only act as a public prosecutor if a warrant for the
appointment of a public prosecutor has been issued against him (P 16 A). Technically,
he has only acted as a Public Prosecutor since he delegated the case to the court. Thus,
the author conducted a research entitled Juridical Analysis of Implementation of Joint
Regulations 2010 Concerning Synchronization of Management of the Criminal Justice
System in Realizing Just Law Enforcement Regarding Coordination Between
Investigators and Public Prosecutors in the Pre-Prosecution Process. The results of this
study are known that the factors that can be an obstacle to the implementation of
coordination between investigators and public prosecutors at the pre-prosecution stage
are the results of investigations that have been declared complete by the public
prosecutor, but not followed by the submission of suspects and evidence, the existence
of arrears in criminal cases that have not been completed. resolved and the termination
of the investigation or prosecution of criminal cases
Andi Hamzah. 1996. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. SaptaArtha Jaya. Jakarta.
Lilik Mulyadi. 1996. Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Peradilan Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno. 1993. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka CiptaJakarta.
Mardjono Reksodiputro. 1994. Hak Asasi manusia Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana
Kumpulan Karangan Buku Ketiga. Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian
Hukum Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
Undang Undang Dasar 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana,
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara
Bambang Hartono dan J.P Widodo, Sistem Peradilan Pidana (SPP)/ Criminal Justice
Sistem (CJS), Makalah, Universitas Bandar Lampung, 2007, hlm.1.
Zainab Ompu Jainah. 2016. Analsis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku
Tindak Pidana Kurir Narkotika (Studi Putusan Perkara No 414/Pid
Sus/2014/PN/Kla. Jurnal Keadilan Progresif Vol. 7 No. 1
Subekti dan Tjitrosudibyo. 1980. Kamus Hukum, Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.
Article MetricsAbstract view : 1 times
PDF - 1 times
- There are currently no refbacks.