ANALISIS MOTIF, ALASAN UMUM DAN MODEL PENGGUNAAN PIDANA MATI TERHADAP TERPIDANA NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA

Abstract

Regarding the imposition of capital punishment on criminals in Indonesia in the perspective
of human rights based on the 1945 Constitution it turns out that it does not violate the
provisions of human rights law. The main problem is the object of research, namely how the
imposition of capital punishment on perpetrators of criminal acts in criminal justice practices
in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research through a statutory approach,
conceptual data used secondary data by conducting library studies and data analysis carried
out by qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that the imposition of capital
punishment on narcotics and psychotropic offenders in criminal justice practices in
Indonesia, the application of narcotics and psychotropic offenders does not violate human
rights because it does not conflict with the provisions of Article 28A, Article 28I paragraph
(1) and Article 28J paragraph ( 2) The 1945 Constitution and does not violate Indonesia's
international legal obligations born of international agreements concerning the eradication
of illicit trafficking in narcotics and psychotropic drugs so that law enforcement needs to be
improved.