Manajemen Mutu Perguruan Tinggi (Sebuah Konsep tentang Mutu Perguruan Tinggi Swasta)

Endah Christianingsih


People considers the quality of private university graduate is not as good as the quality of state university. It might be true especially at the time where private university hasnt followed the process of selection system for the students candidate. Along with the time, the improvement of qualified students that will be accepted, the improvement of qualified lecturer, and the accreditation issue have selected the private university that has not fulfilled the required conditions and even better than state university (Directorate General of Higher Education, National Education Department). If it seen from the University Web Ranking, Universities in Indonesia by 2011, the private university has taken the sixth, eighth, eleventh, and twentieth rank, and the rest of them are dominated by the state university.What have been described above surely become the challenge for the private university. Therefore, the private university should more concern to the quality. The quality of higher education is comprehended as the combination of its product characteristics and customer need, especially students (primer customer) and work place (tarsier customer) (Tampubolon, 2001:74). For the reason of sustainability, it will be better if the private university takes this issue with the hard effort and willing to change and does the continuously improvement to reach the quality standard wanted by the stakeholders.


quality, private university, challenge, concern, stakeholder


Arcoro, Jerome S. (1995). Quality in Education, An Implementation Hand Book. St Lucie Press. 100 Linton Blud. Suite 403 B Deray Beach. FL 33483.

Artushina, Irina. and Troyan, Vladimir (2007). Methods of Quality of Higher Education Social Assesment. Journal Higher Education in Europe. 32,(1).

Centra, John A. (1982). Determining Faculty Effectiveness Assessing Teaching Research and Service for Personel Decisions and Improvement. London: Jossey - Bass Publisher.

Clark, Burton (1983). The Higher Education System Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Los Angeles London: University of California Press.

Christopher, William F. & Thor, Carl G. (2001). World-Class Quality & Productivity. United Kingdom: Crisp Publication Inc.

Directorate General of Higher Education. Higher Education Long Term Strategy (HELTS) 2003-2010.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2003). Pedoman Penjaminan Mutu Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

_______. (2003). Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia dalam Lintasan dan Peristiwa. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Hedwig, Rinda. dan Polla Getardus. (2006). Model Sistem Penjaminan Mutu & Proses Penerapannya di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Hedwig, Rinda. (2007). Sistem Penjaminan Mutu di Perguruan Tinggi Monitoring dan Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Indrajid, R. Eko dan Djokopranoto, R. (2006). Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Modern. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.

Jeffries, David R., Evans, Bill. Dan Reynolds, Peter. (1993). Training for Total Quality Management. London: Published in association with the Institute of Training and Development.

Juran, J.M. (Penerjemah Edi Nugroho). (1995). Kepemimpinan Mutu Pedoman Peningkatan Mutu untuk Meraih Keunggulan Kompetitif. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.

Nasution, M.N. (2004). Manajemen Mutu Terpadu. Bogor Selatan: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sallis. Edward (1993). Total Quality Management in Education. Philadelphia: Kogan Page

Tampubolon, Daulat P. (2001). Perguruan Tinggi Bermutu Paradigma Baru Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Menghadapi Tantangan Abad ke-21. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Willbom dan Cheng. (1994). Global Management of Quality Assurance System. New York San Fransisco Washington DC: McGrawHill, Inc.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 299 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.