ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERATURAN BERSAMA KETUA MARI, MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAM, JAKSA AGUNG DAN KAPOLRI TAHUN 2010 TERHADAP BATASAN WAKTU PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI TERPIDANA MATI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA

Jainah Ompu Zainab, Muharam Asih Novi

Abstract


Drug abuse appears in the mass media, both in newspapers, magazines,
television, radio and the internet. The problem of narcotics has now penetrated all
elements of the nation, from children to adults, from the lower classes to officials,
artists, even politicians and law enforcement are also not sterile from narcotics abuse.
As stipulated in the attachment of Law no. 22 of 1997 concerning Junto Law no. 35 of
2009 concerning Narcotics, it is stated that importing, exporting, producing, using
narcotics without strict control and supervision, and contrary to applicable laws and
regulations is a crime because it is very detrimental and is a very big danger to human
life, society, nation. , and the state and national resilience of Indonesia. Based on the
existing background, the authors conducted a research entitled Normative Juridical
Analysis of Joint Regulations of the Chairperson of MARI, Minister of Law and Human
Rights, Attorney General and National Police Chief in 2010 Against the Time Limit for
Execution of Death Convicts Based on Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The
enforcement of the death penalty in narcotics crimes based on L Friedman's system
theory regarding law enforcement can be seen from the legal structure, where quality
and good law enforcement officers such as the police, BNN will determine the success
of the law enforcement process. Then the death penalty is also maintained based on
reasons of public interest (public protection), but in its implementation it also pays
attention to individual interests/protection.


Keywords


Execution of Narcotics Abusers, L Friedman's Theor

Full Text:

PDF

References


J.E. Sahetapy,. 1979. Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana,

Penerbit Alumni, Bandung,

Lawrence M. Friedman, 2006 Sebagaimana dikutip dari R Arief Hidayat, Kebebasan

Berserikat Di Indonesia (Suatu Analisis Pengaruh Perubahan Sistem Politik

Terhadap Penafsiran Hukum), Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro,

Semarang.

Syahrudin Husein. 2003. Pidana mati menurut Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bagian

Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, . Sumatera Utara.

Soedjono. 2000. Segi Hukum Tentang Narkotika di Indonesia. Karya Nusantara.

Bandung.

Soerjono Soekanto,. 2008. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum.

Jakarta : Divisi Buku Perguruan Tinggi PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro. 1974. Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, Penerbit Sumur

Bandung.

Peraturan Bersama antara Ketua MARI, Menteri Hukum Dan HAM RI, Jaksa Agung

RI dan Kapolri Nomor: 009/KMA/SKB/V/2010, Nomor : M.HH-

UM.03.01TAHUN 2010, Nomor KEP-059/A/JA/05/2010, Nomor

B/14/V/2010 Tahun 2010 Tentang Sinkronisasi Ketatalaksanaan Sistem

Peradilan Pidana Dalam Mewujudkan Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara

Pidana, (KUHAP)

Suprato. 2009. Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika dan

Psikotropika di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan

UUD 1945. Jurnal masalah-Masalah hukum. Undip. Semarang

Bambang Hartono dan J.P Widodo, Sistem Peradilan Pidana (SPP)/ Criminal Justice

Sistem (CJS), Makalah, Universitas Bandar Lampung, 2007


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.